This initiative gives guidance for caregivers and anyone who wants to enable kids to flourish on a flourishing planet.
The site is under construction and released as a beta for you who want to share what you want to see on the site. If you have ideas, please do get in touch!
Together we enabled the next generations to flourish



WHAT | STEP 2: FOOTPRINT - DOING THINGS RIGHT
Reduce negative impacts
Sustainability typically means reducing negative impacts in the production and use of a product. This means that focus for that approach to sustainability is often on doing the same things in a less harmful way.
On this page you can see what kind of actions this usually includes and how they should be prioritised according to the widely used "Mitigation hierarchy".
A note of caution when reading the below is that while harm reduction is necessary for the solutions truly needed to meet basic needs, most efforts to reduce a solution's footprint focus on doing the same things less bad rather than on questioning if the solution is needed in the first place. This means that many solutions can on the whole encourage further consumption as those solutions are marketed as 'green'.
It is therefore important to review this step after the first step (Mindprint) has been taken, to understand if and what real needs might exist for kids to flourish and choose a solution based on that.

1. Identify real needs
"Do the right things" first - "do things right" thereafter
Based on the Decent Living Standards framework used by the IPCC, as well as other acknowledged human needs frameworks, this site includes solutions for the needs below. The first three categories focus on needs for a child's personal growth, while Smart living and Nutrion & Health relate to its physiological needs. The last need, Participation, may be seen as a higher level need as it moves beyond the individual itself to contribute to the betterment of society. If a basic need is identified, the second step is to prioritise actions to meet the need, see below.
Discover more

WHAT | PRIORITISATION
Prioritisation of actions for harm reduction
To mitigate or compensate for negative impacts, there are essentially four different strategies according to the widespread “Mitigation Hierarchy”. First, negative impacts that can be avoided should be avoided. Second, impacts that can't be avoided should be reduced.
If needed, restoration and offsetting projects should only be used as a last resort and with great caution, as they are unproven, related to high risks and can result in dangerous unsustainable lock-ins. In line with the most ambitious climate science that focuses on mitigation instead of offsetting, offsetting is not dealt with on this site (the same goes for restoration that could be seen as a form of offsetting, compensating for harm already done). Still, they are mentioned to provide an understanding of where they are on the priority list and what risks are associated with them.




1. Avoid
2. Reduce
3. Restore
4. Offset



